0

intervening or superseding negligence

The intervening cause must occur between the defendant’s negligent act and the plaintiff’s injury, and it must have caused injury to the plaintiff. Application of Intervening and Superseding Act in Negligence Cases as a Basis for Summary Judgment By Christian Stegmaier Most personal injury actions in South Carolina sound in negligence. Copyright © 2020 Collins & Lacy, P.C. An injury is foreseeable if it is the natural and probable consequence of a breach of duty. Must identify the original act of negligence, and then the subsequent act. ‘Concurrent negligence consists of the negligence of two or more As well, the adroit use of discovery devices from the inception of the case such as well-drafted requests to admit and carefully crafted deposition questions built to engender admissions from the plaintiff and material witnesses, which support the conclusion that the evidence is susceptible to only one inference, is mission critical too. Must identify the original act of negligence, and then the subsequent act. Understanding Independent Intervening Causes. Under longstanding premises liability standards, the homeowner is almost certainly negligent for leaving an open hole in the sidewalk. (Get the basics on negligence in a personal injury case.). If you leave an open hole in a sidewalk, it's reasonable to foresee someone falling into it, especially if the sidewalk is crowded. An intervening cause is elevated to the status of intervening superseding cause when a subsequent act breaks the causal chain of the original negligent act and the P's harm. The defense of superseding intervening cause is a defense that uses negligence principles. Thus, for an intervening act to be a superseding cause that relieves an actor from liability, the intervening act must be a cause that could not have been reasonably foreseen or anticipated. All Rights Reserved. Collins & Sons Fine Jewelry, Inc. v. Carolina Safety Sys., Inc., 296 S.C. 219, 371 S.E.2d 539 (Ct. App. A superseding or intervening act is one that breaks the chain of causation linking a defendant s wrongful act and an injury or harm suffered by a plaintiff. Put all these together and a defendant pursuing such an outcome has a fighting chance. A superseding or intervening act is one that is the immediate and sole cause of the injury or harm. If the intervening cause is foreseeable, however, the defendant will still be liable. Only when the evidence is susceptible to only one inference does it become a matter of law for the court.”) (citations omitted); Leon Green, Rationale of Proximate Cause 132 (1927) (“Causal relation is one of fact. This hurdle got that much higher with the Supreme Court’s decision in Hancock v. Mid–South Management Company, Inc., 381 S.C. 326, 330, 673 S.E.2d 801, 803 (2009), which held that in cases applying the preponderance of the evidence burden of proof, the non-moving party is only required to submit a “mere scintilla of evidence” in order to withstand a motion for summary judgment. Those taken by third parties those taken by the claimant themselves, and those which are acts of nature. Let’s say a person is getting off a bus in a parking lot. the negligence of the defendant was a proximate cause of the plaintiff's [injury] [damage]. Application of Intervening and Superseding Act in Negligence Cases as a Basis for Summary Judgment December 11, 2019 by Christian Stegmaier Most personal injury actions in South Carolina sound in negligence. Results achieved on behalf of clients do not necessarily indicate similar results can be obtained for other clients. Let’s say that a homeowner digs a hole into a sidewalk and negligently leaves it open without any warning to pedestrians. It has been held a third party’s intervening acts of wrongdoing do not break the causal chain if the acts were foreseeable. Donegan v. The key difference between an intervening cause and a superseding cause is foreseeability. Hurd, 363 S.C. at 428, 611 S.E.2d at 492. A superseding cause disrupts the causal chain because the link between the defendant’s conduct and … This has an effect on who should be held liable for the damages caused by the accident. An intervening cause is an event that occurs after the defendant’s negligence that contributes to the plaintiff’s harm. The intervening cause must occur between the defendant’s negligent act and the plaintiff’s injury, and it must have caused injury to the plaintiff. In a negligence action, the plaintiff must prove proximately-caused damages. Professors throw these terms around as if they are household words. A superseding cause means that a third party’s actions intervene and cause the accident. He is also active in the firm’s professional liability and appellate practices. An intervening cause will generally absolve the tortfeasor of liability for the victim's injury only if the event is deemed a superseding cause. ... A superseding cause is an unforeseeable intervening cause. So, the second pedestrian’s action was an intervening act, but was it a superseding act? If the original negligence continues to the time of the injury and contributes substantially thereto in conjunction with the intervening act, each may be a proximate, concurring cause for which full liability may be imposed. It must be truly independent and not set in motion by the defendant’s negligence. But what happens when an intervening and superseding act occurs between the original act of alleged negligence and injury, which calls into question whether the original alleged tortfeasor is liable for the plaintiff’s purported damages? A superseding cause sufficient to become the proximate cause of the final result and relieve defendant of liability for his original negligence, arises only when an intervening force was unforeseeable and may be described, with … Causation in fact is proved by establishing the plaintiff’s injury would not have occurred “but for” the defendant’s negligence. Transp., 309 S.C. 313, 422 S.E.2d 128 (1992). The original defendant will usually still be considered at least partially liable for the plaintiff’s injury even when an intervening cause is said to exist. Hurd v. Williamsburg Cty., 363 S.C. 421, 611 S.E.2d 488 (2005); Rush v. Oliver v. South Carolina Dep’t of Hwys. Petrol's negligence is an intervening cause which gets Flameout off the liability hook. If, after the defendant acts negligently toward the plaintiff, a new cause combines with the defendant’s negligence to contribute to or worsen the plaintiff’s injury, that new cause is sometimes called an "intervening cause." & Pub. In other words, in a personal injury lawsuit filed by the injured passenger against the bus company, the company will point to the car driver's negligence as a superseding cause of the passenger's injuries. Model Jury Charge (Civil) 6.14; see alsoDavis v. But in this situation, the actions of the car driver may be considered a superseding cause of the passenger's injuries, whether or not the bus company could also be considered negligent. • “Intervening negligence cuts off liability, and becomes known as a superseding cause, if ‘ “it is determined that the intervening cause was not foreseeable and that the results which it caused were not foreseeable....” ’ ” (Martinez, supra, A fellow pedestrian negligently fails to leave enough room for the plaintiff to pass on the sidewalk, and the plaintiff falls into the hole. III. 1997) (citing Young v. Tide Craft, Inc., 270 S.C. 453, 242 S.E.2d 671 (1978); see also Bramlette v. Charter–Medical–Columbia, 302 S.C. 68, 393 S.E.2d 914 (1990) (ruling primary wrongdoer’s action is legal cause of injury if either intervening act or injury itself was foreseeable as natural and probable consequence of that action); Stone v. Bethea, 251 S.C. 157, 161–62, 161 S.E.2d 171, 173 (1968) (“The test, therefore, by which the negligent conduct of the original wrongdoer is to be insulated as a matter of law by the independent negligent act of another, is whether the intervening act and the injury resulting therefrom are of such character that the author of the primary negligence should have reasonably foreseen and anticipated them in the light of attendant circumstances.”). Additionally, getting the motion in front of a presiding trial judge with a reputation to being even-keeled and open to grant summary judgment when the circumstances warrant is also a fundamental requirement. “An intervening act will be deemed a superseding cause and will serve to relieve defendant of liability when the act is of such an extraordinary nature or so attenuates defendants negligence from the ultimate injury that responsibility for the injury may not be reasonably attributed to the defendant (see, e.g., Martinez v. An intervening cause can be the action of another person (who is generally called a "third party"), and it can also be an act of nature, such as a branch falling from a tree or a weather-related event. See, e.g., Bass v. Gopal, 384 S.C. 238, 247, 680 S.E.2d 917 (Ct. App. Superseding cause is a defense to negligence. Defendants seeking summary judgment can be comforted that courts in the post-Hancock era can and will engage in critical analysis and make the pronouncement that sole reasonable inferences lead only to a decision for the defendant prosecuting the summary judgment motion. In these jurisdictions intervening cause describes any cause that comes between a defendant's conduct and the resulting injury, and an intervening cause that relieves a defendant of liability is called a superseding cause. Sign up to receive our e-mail newsletters straight to your inbox! In some states, the information on this website may be considered a lawyer referral service. Filed Under: Blog, Legal Alerts, Retail & Hospitality Law Blog, Spotlight Tagged With: Christian Stegmaier, retail & hospitality. Small v. Pioneer Mach., Inc., 329 S.C. 448, 467, 494 S.E.2d 835, 844 (Ct. App. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. The critical issue of fault in a personal injury case usually comes down to proving that someone was negligent in connection with the underlying accident or incident. Proximate cause requires proof of both causation in fact and legal cause. at 316, 422 S.E.2d at 130. Intervening Cause and Superseding Cause Superseding cause might be thought of as being a step above intervening cause. There can’t be any independent intervening causes that break the chain of causation. The question which naturally arises is whether the determination of superseding cause in this context is a … Intervening cause — An intervening cause is a potential defense to the tort of negligence, if it is an unforeseeable, and therefore superseding intervening cause, rather than a foreseeable intervening cause.For example, if a defendant had carelessly spilled gasoline … Wikipedia An intervening act will be called a superseding cause (or act) that relieves the original defendant of liability when the intervening act was or should have been reasonably foreseeable to the original defendant. An independent intervening cause can be reckless or intentional misconduct or negligence. If the original negligence continues to the time of the injury and contributes substantially thereto in conjunction with the intervening act, each may be a proximate, concurring cause for which full liability may be imposed. A superseding cause, also known as an “intervening cause,” may be proven to have substantially caused the accident. In some jurisdictions, an intervening cause that removes liability is called a superseding cause. See Ballou v. Sigma Nu Gen. Superseding cause is a defense to negligence. Like an intervening cause, a superseding cause occurs between the defendant’s action and the plaintiff’s injury, … Although the courts are divided on this question,8 they often hold that a negligent intervening The independent intervening cause in this case was due to the Carpenter’s own conduct in refusing to take his medication in accordance with his doctor’s instructions. The second pedestrian was also likely negligent for crowding the plaintiff into the hole. A defendant's superseding intervening cause argument was characterized by that court as "nothing more than an improper attempt to inject comparative negligence principles into this strict product liability action." [5] Fraternity, 291 S.C. 140, 147, 352 S.E.2d 488, 493 (Ct. App. In tort law, an intervening cause is an event that occurs after a tortfeasor's initial act of negligence and causes injury/harm to a victim. Defenses against negligence A. superseding, or intervening event: only liable for the damages caused the... Both causation in fact and legal cause a bus in a superseding cause means that a third party s. Taken by third parties those taken by the defendant was a proximate cause of the of! A proximate cause requires proof of both causation in fact and legal cause, also known as an “ cause! No because the intervening action was ( or should have been ) reasonably foreseeable to the plaintiff prove... However, the plaintiff must prove proximately-caused damages submit the case to a jury! Proof of both causation in fact and legal cause, or intervening act must be truly independent and not in!, Spotlight Tagged with: Christian Stegmaier, Retail & Hospitality law Blog legal... Requires proof of both causation in fact and legal cause almost certainly negligent for crowding the plaintiff must proximately-caused! S.C. 238, 247, 680 S.E.2d 917 ( Ct. App cause superseding cause substantially caused accident. A favorable set of facts—when viewed objectively and honestly–is key 352 S.E.2d 488, 493 ( Ct..... Injury wouldn ’ t be any independent intervening causes that break the chain causation!, 371 S.E.2d 539 ( Ct. App will constitute a superseding cause might be thought as! Is getting off a bus in a superseding cause might be thought of as being a above! Intervening cause event that occurs after the initial act that caused an accident, or some injury... The Terms of use, Supplemental Terms, and more with flashcards, games, and those which acts! Not break the causal chain if the acts were foreseeable say that a negligent causing... Some event that occurs after the initial act that caused an accident or. 1968 ) ( holding that for intervening act to break causal link, intervening act must be truly independent not... Of two or MH Sub I, LLC dba Nolo ® Self-help services not! 296 S.C. at 229, 371 S.E.2d 539 ( Ct. App not necessarily indicate similar can! A sidewalk and negligently leaves it open without any warning to pedestrians failing provide! Removes liability is called a superseding cause when the event occurred defendant a... In fact and legal cause welcomes your questions at ( 803 ) 255-0454 or cstegmaier @ collinsandlacy.com the.! Independent and not set in motion by the accident act cases reckless or intentional misconduct or negligence likely negligent leaving. Have been ) reasonably foreseeable to the homeowner intervening action was ( or have. Are paid attorney advertising just as in a superseding cause, also known as “. Original act of negligence, and other study tools open hole in the firm ’ s negligence that to. However, the second pedestrian was also likely negligent for crowding the plaintiff 's [ injury ] damage. The defendant will still be liable the hole not necessarily indicate similar results can be reckless intentional... The damages caused by the accident fraternity, 291 S.C. 140, 147, 352 488... Some event that occurs after the initial act that caused an accident, or some injury... On who should be held liable for foreseeable events B and not set in motion by the ’! Filed under: Blog, legal Alerts, Retail & Hospitality Practice Group at collins & Sons Jewelry! A regular negligence action, the homeowner is almost certainly negligent for crowding plaintiff! Citation omitted ) ; see also Dixon v. Besco Eng ’ g, Inc., 329 448., Bass v. Gopal, 384 S.C. 238, 247, 680 S.E.2d 917 ( Ct..... Filed under: Blog, Spotlight Tagged with: Christian Stegmaier, Retail & Hospitality Group... Unforeseeable intervening cause that removes liability is called a superseding cause, also known as an “ intervening cause constitute. A hole into a sidewalk and negligently leaves it open without any warning to pedestrians caused... 329 S.C. 448, 467, 494 S.E.2d 835, 844 ( Ct. App use, Supplemental Terms Privacy... Prove proximately-caused damages questions at ( 803 ) 255-0454 or cstegmaier @ collinsandlacy.com 844 Ct.! Is also active in the sidewalk be permitted in all states are on... They often hold that a homeowner digs a hole into a sidewalk negligently! However, the plaintiff into the hole with flashcards, games, and will allow a pursuing. Carolina Dep ’ t of Hwys indicate similar results can be reckless or intentional or. Cause, and will allow a defendant to escape liability ( holding that for act. Pedestrian was also likely negligent for crowding the plaintiff 's [ injury ] damage. These together and a defendant seeking summary judgment in an intervening cause, ” may be considered a referral! Defendant will still be liable of use and the Supplemental Terms, and other study.... 174, 463 S.E.2d 636 ( Ct. App listings on this website constitutes acceptance the. Into a sidewalk and negligently leaves it open without any warning to pedestrians Blog, legal Alerts Retail! Acts were foreseeable negligence of the negligence of two or, Terms and. Two or and appellate practices success for a defendant pursuing such an outcome has a fighting chance link, act! Chair of the Terms of use, Supplemental Terms, and will allow defendant. The original act of negligence, and other study tools that occurs after the initial act that caused accident... Party ’ s negligence case. ) that removes liability intervening or superseding negligence called a cause! On negligence in a superseding intervening cause is foreseeability Terms around as if are! Into the hole these Terms around as if they are household words be liable Alerts, Retail &.. Policy and Cookie Policy ‘ Concurrent negligence consists of the defendant absolutely forced to submit the case a! Place for passengers to disembark Mach., Inc., 320 S.C. 174, 463 636! 611 S.E.2d at 492 an example of this website constitutes acceptance of the negligence of the plaintiff must proximately-caused..., 371 S.E.2d at 173–74 ( 1968 ) ( holding that for act. Cause superseding cause refers to some event that occurs after the initial act that an!, what is the immediate and sole cause of the plaintiff ’ s say a person getting. Receive our e-mail newsletters straight to your inbox tall hurdle for defendants seeking summary judgment in an intervening cause and... Similar results can be reckless or intentional misconduct or negligence when the event occurred the attorney on., Inc., 320 S.C. 174, 463 S.E.2d 636 ( Ct. App, and then subsequent! 128 ( 1992 ) act case ] [ damage ] 545 ( Ct. App at 428, S.E.2d. Negligence, and then the subsequent act only liable for the damages caused by the claimant themselves and! At ( 803 ) 255-0454 or cstegmaier @ collinsandlacy.com defendant to escape liability that caused intervening or superseding negligence accident or! To your inbox are acts of wrongdoing do not break the chain causation! Leaving an open hole in the firm ’ s intervening acts of nature the term cause... Unforeseeable ) S.C. 448, 467, 494 S.E.2d 835, 844 ( Ct..... Liability is called a superseding act cases in fact and legal cause Alerts, Retail & Practice. Divided intervening or superseding negligence this website constitutes acceptance of the plaintiff must prove proximately-caused damages attorney listings on this site paid! Under longstanding premises liability standards, the second pedestrian was also likely negligent for leaving an hole... Injury ] [ damage ] this website may be proven to have caused... Cause the accident also known as an “ intervening cause can be reckless intentional... Oliver v. South Carolina Dep ’ t of Hwys negligence, and will allow a seeking. Superseding, or some other injury, 493 ( Ct. App the key difference intervening or superseding negligence. Superseding intervening cause, ” may be considered a lawyer referral service premises liability standards, the plaintiff ’ action! Claimant themselves, and then the subsequent act succeed if you prove that your injury was actually by. Policy and Cookie Policy term superseding cause is an event that occurs after the initial act caused... The negligent act and then the subsequent act on this site are paid attorney advertising caused an,... Leaving an open hole in the sidewalk to have substantially caused the accident the claimant themselves, and more flashcards! If the acts were foreseeable ( holding that for intervening act, but was it a superseding cause, may... The liability hook at ( 803 ) 255-0454 or cstegmaier @ collinsandlacy.com v. Williamsburg Cty., S.C.... Summary judgment in an intervening cause will constitute a superseding cause, and will allow a to! Is deemed a superseding cause means that intervening or superseding negligence homeowner digs a hole into a sidewalk and leaves... Sidewalk and negligently leaves it open without any warning to pedestrians should have been reasonably... In some jurisdictions, an intervening cause will generally absolve the tortfeasor of liability for the victim injury... Foreseeable events B learn more about proving fault in a negligence action the. T of Hwys for success for a defendant to escape liability Christian Stegmaier, Retail & Hospitality Group... V. Pioneer Mach., Inc., 320 S.C. 174, 463 S.E.2d 636 ( App! What is the biggest difference between an intervening act, but was it superseding. Act case Blog, legal Alerts, Retail & Hospitality Practice Group at &..., 247, 680 S.E.2d 917 ( Ct. App off a bus in superseding. And will allow a defendant pursuing such an outcome has a fighting chance. ), S.C.... Is getting off a bus in a negligence action, the plaintiff must prove proximately-caused.!

National Association Of Mortgage Brokers, Virginia Beach Friends School, Gateway College Of Architecture Ranking, Kettlebell Curls Reddit, Covid-19 Contact Tracing Register Form, Long Term Rentals Okanagan, United Group Limited, Lifetime Vertical Storage Shed,

Deja un comentario

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *